Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.403
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 209(10): 1229-1237, 2024 May 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38163381

RESUMO

Rationale: Low FEV1 is a biomarker of increased mortality. The association of normal lung function and mortality is not well described. Objectives: To evaluate the FEV1-mortality association among participants with normal lung function. Methods: A total of 10,999 Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) responders and 10,901 Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) participants, aged 18-65 years with FEV1 ⩾80% predicted, were analyzed, with FEV1 percent predicted calculated using Global Lung Function Initiative Global race-neutral reference equations. Mortality data were obtained from linkages to the National Death Index. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the association between FEV1 and all-cause mortality, controlling for age, sex, race/ethnicity, smoking history, and, for FDNY, work assignment. Cohorts were followed for a maximum of 20.3 years. Measurements and Main Results: We observed 504 deaths (4.6%) of 10,999 for FDNY and 1,237 deaths (9.4% [weighted]) of 10,901 for NHANES III. Relative to FEV1 ⩾120% predicted, mortality was significantly higher for FEV1 100-109%, 90-99%, and 80-89% predicted in the FDNY cohort. In the NHANES III cohort, mortality was significantly higher for FEV1 90-99% and 80-89% predicted. Each 10% higher predicted FEV1 was associated with 15% (hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.91) and 23% (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.84) lower mortality for FDNY and NHANES III, respectively. Conclusions: In both cohorts, higher FEV1 is associated with lower mortality, suggesting higher FEV1 is a biomarker of better health. These findings demonstrate that a single cross-sectional measurement of FEV1 is predictive of mortality over two decades, even when FEV1 is in the normal range.


Assuntos
Inquéritos Nutricionais , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Adulto , Idoso , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Socorristas/estatística & dados numéricos , Pulmão/fisiopatologia
2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 58(3): 259-270, 2024 Mar 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36753456

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer screening uptake in the United States overall has increased, but racial/ethnic disparities persist and data on colonoscopy uptake by racial/ethnic subgroups are lacking. We sought to better characterize these trends and to identify predictors of colonoscopy uptake, particularly among Asian and Hispanic subgroups. STUDY: We used data from the New York City Community Health Survey to generate estimates of up-to-date colonoscopy use in Asian and Hispanic subgroups across 6 time periods spanning 2003-2016. For each subgroup, we calculated the percent change in colonoscopy uptake over the study period and the difference in uptake compared to non-Hispanic Whites in 2015-2016. We also used multivariable logistic regression to identify predictors of colonoscopy uptake. RESULTS: All racial and ethnic subgroups with reliable estimates saw a net increase in colonoscopy uptake between 2003 and 2016. In 2015-2016, compared with non-Hispanic Whites, Puerto Ricans, Dominicans, and Central/South Americans had higher colonoscopy uptake, whereas Chinese, Asian Indians, and Mexicans had lower uptake. On multivariable analysis, age, marital status, insurance status, primary care provider, receipt of flu vaccine, frequency of exercise, and smoking status were the most consistent predictors of colonoscopy uptake (≥4 time periods). CONCLUSIONS: We found significant variation in colonoscopy uptake among Asian and Hispanic subgroups. We also identified numerous demographic, socioeconomic, and health-related predictors of colonoscopy uptake. These findings highlight the importance of examining health disparities through the lens of disaggregated racial/ethnic subgroups and have the potential to inform future public health interventions.


Assuntos
Asiático , Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais , Hispânico ou Latino , Grupos Populacionais dos Estados Unidos da América , Humanos , População do Caribe/estatística & dados numéricos , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Colonoscopia/tendências , Hispânico ou Latino/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , População Norte-Americana/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Colorretais/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/etnologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/tendências , Brancos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Populacionais dos Estados Unidos da América/etnologia , Grupos Populacionais dos Estados Unidos da América/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 43(1): 84-87, 2024 Jan 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37963272

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In the United States, uptake of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been exceptionally low as compared with other vaccines. During the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, routine vaccinations were deferred or delayed, further exacerbating HPV vaccine hesitancy. The specific effect of the pandemic on HPV vaccination rates in the United States has not been yet described. METHODS: We aimed to determine the percentage of children achieving full HPV vaccination (2 doses) by age 15 years and to compare prepandemic to pandemic rates of HPV vaccination at pediatric practices across our institution. A retrospective chart review was performed to compare HPV vaccination rates in the "prepandemic" and "pandemic" periods for all children 9 through 14 years of age. Additionally, peaks in COVID-19 positivity were compared with HPV vaccination rates. RESULTS: Of children 9-14 years old, 49.3% received at least 1 dose of HPV vaccine in the prepandemic period, compared with 33.5% during the pandemic ( P < 0.0001). Only 33.5% of patients received the full 2-dose series of HPV prepandemic, compared with 19.0% of patients during the pandemic ( P < 0.0001). When COVID-19 positivity rates peaked, HPV vaccination also declined. CONCLUSIONS: The issue of low HPV vaccination rates was amplified due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as illustrated by the correlation between peaks in COVID-19 positivity and low rates of HPV vaccination.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Vacinas contra Papillomavirus , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Criança , Adolescente , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinação
4.
Am J Prev Med ; 66(2): 235-242, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37816459

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High levels of tobacco retailer density in communities is associated with a range of tobacco use behaviors and is a key structural driver of tobacco-related disparities. This study evaluates the impacts of New York City's (NYC) novel policy intervention to cap tobacco retail licenses on tobacco retailer density levels and neighborhood inequities in tobacco access. METHODS: Using geocoded tobacco retail licensing data from 2010 to 2022, Bayesian conditional autoregressive Poisson panel models estimated the association between policy implementation in 2018 and retailer density per 1,000 population, controlling for neighborhood-level sociodemographic factors. Data were analyzed in 2023. RESULTS: The number of tobacco retail licenses decreased from 9,304 in 2010 to 5,107 in 2022, with the rate of decline significantly accelerating post-policy (-14·2% versus -34·2%). Policy effects were stronger in districts with lower income and greater proportions of non-Hispanic Black residents. CONCLUSIONS: NYC's policy substantially reduced tobacco retailer density and appeared to close longstanding patterns of inequity in tobacco access, serving as a rare example of a tobacco control policy that may effectively reduce tobacco-related disparities. This emergent approach to restructure tobacco retail in communities may reach populations that have not benefitted from traditional tobacco control policies and should be considered by other localities.


Assuntos
Produtos do Tabaco , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Teorema de Bayes , Uso de Tabaco , Comércio
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 45(1): 21-26, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37462117

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine differences in risk factors and outcomes of patients undergoing colon surgery in level 1 trauma centers versus other hospitals and to investigate the potential financial impact of these reportable infections. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2022. SETTING: Large public healthcare system in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: All patients undergoing colon surgery; comparisons were made between (1) all patients undergoing colon surgery at the level 1 trauma centers versus patients at the other hospitals and (2) the nontrauma and trauma patients at the level 1 trauma centers versus the nontrauma patients at other hospitals. RESULTS: Of 5,217 colon surgeries reported, 3,531 were at level 1 trauma centers and 1686 at other hospitals. Patients at level 1 trauma centers had significantly increased American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores, durations of surgery, rates of delayed wound closure, and rates of class 4 wounds, resulting in higher SIRs (1.1 ± 0.15 vs 0.75 ± 0.18; P = .0007) compared to the other hospitals. Compared to the nontrauma patients at the other hospitals, both the nontrauma and trauma patients at the level 1 trauma centers had higher ASA scores, rates of delayed wound closure, and of class 4 wounds. The SIRs of the nontrauma patients (1.16 ± 1.29; P = .008) and trauma patients (1.26 ± 2.69; P = .066) at the level 1 trauma center were higher than the SIRs of nontrauma patients in the other hospitals (0.65 ± 1.18). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing colon surgery at level 1 trauma centers had increased complexity of surgery compared to the patients in other hospitals. Until there is appropriate adjustment for these risk factors, the use of infections following colon surgery as a reportable quality measure should be re-evaluated.


Assuntos
Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Colo/cirurgia , Atenção à Saúde , Ferimentos e Lesões/cirurgia
6.
Environ Health Perspect ; 131(10): 107001, 2023 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37791759

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Living in neighborhoods with higher levels of walkability has been associated with a reduced risk of obesity and higher levels of physical activity. Obesity has been linked to increased risk of 13 cancers in women. However, long-term prospective studies of neighborhood walkability and risk for obesity-related cancer are scarce. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the association between long-term average neighborhood walkability and obesity-related cancer risk in women. METHODS: The New York University Women's Health Study (NYUWHS) is a prospective cohort with 14,274 women recruited between 1985 and 1991 in New York City and followed over nearly three decades. We geocoded residential addresses for each participant throughout follow-up and calculated an average annual measure of neighborhood walkability across years of follow-up using data on population density and accessibility to destinations associated with geocoded residential addresses. We used ICD-9 codes to characterize first primary obesity-related cancers and employed Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association between average neighborhood walkability and risk of overall and site-specific obesity-related cancers. RESULTS: Residing in neighborhoods with a higher walkability level was associated with a reduced risk of overall and site-specific obesity-related cancers. The hazards ratios associated with a 1-standard deviation increase in average annual neighborhood walkability were 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.93) for overall obesity-related cancer, 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84, 0.95) for postmenopausal breast cancer, 0.82 (95% CI: 0.68, 0.99) for ovarian cancer, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.76, 0.99) for endometrial cancer, and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.49, 0.94) for multiple myeloma, adjusting for potential confounders at both the individual and neighborhood level. The association between neighborhood walkability and risk of overall obesity-related cancer was stronger among women living in neighborhoods with higher levels of poverty compared with women living in areas with lower poverty levels (pInteraction=0.006). DISCUSSION: Our study highlights a potential protective role of neighborhood walkability in preventing obesity-related cancers in women. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP11538.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Caminhada , Humanos , Feminino , Estudos Prospectivos , Universidades , Planejamento Ambiental , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Características de Residência , Saúde da Mulher , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia
7.
West J Emerg Med ; 24(5): 956-961, 2023 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37788037

RESUMO

Background: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common abdominal surgical emergency in children and adolescents. In the year immediately following the declaration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), there was a precipitous decline in emergency department (ED) visits especially for surgical conditions and infectious diseases. Fear of exposure to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 infection resulted in delay in presentation and time to surgery, and a shift toward more conservative management. Objective: Our goal was to compare the incidence and severity of AA before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Patients aged 2-18 years admitted with the diagnosis of AA to Flushing Hospital Medical Center or Jamaica Hospital Medical Center in Queens, New York, were selected for chart review. Data extracted from electronic health records included demographics, clinical findings, imaging studies, and operative and pathological findings. We calculated the Alvarado score (AS) for incidence and the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grade for severity. We compared patients admitted between March 1, 2018-February 29, 2020 (pre-pandemic) to patients admitted between March 1, 2020-February 28, 2021 (pandemic). We then compared pre-pandemic and pandemic groups to determine differences in pediatric AA incidence and severity. Results: Of 239 patients diagnosed with AA, 184 (77%) were in the pre-pandemic group and 55 (23%) in the pandemic group. Incidence (number per year) of AA declined by 40%. The pandemic group had significantly greater overall AS of ≥7, indicating increased likelihood to require surgery, (P = 0.04) and higher AAST grade demonstrating increased severity (P = 0.02). Conclusion: There was a decline in the number of AA cases seen in our pediatric EDs and admitted during the first year of the pandemic. Clinicians need to be aware of increased severity of AA at time of presentation during public health emergencies such as a pandemic, possibly due to modified patient behavior.


Assuntos
Apendicite , COVID-19 , Adolescente , Humanos , Criança , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Apendicite/epidemiologia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Pandemias , Hospitalização , Doença Aguda
8.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37887662

RESUMO

Studies of the health impacts of the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks on New York City's (NYC's) World Trade Center (WTC) towers have been hindered by imprecise estimates of exposure. We sought to identify potential biomarkers of WTC exposure by measuring trace and major metal concentrations in lung tissues from WTC-exposed individuals and less exposed community controls. We also investigated associations of lung tissue metal concentrations with self-reported exposure and respiratory symptoms. The primary analyses contrasted post-mortem lung tissue concentrations obtained from autopsies in 2007-2011 of 76 WTC Health Registry (WTCHR) enrollees with those of 55 community controls. Community controls were frequency-matched to WTCHR decedents by age at death, calendar quarter of death, gender, race, ethnicity and education and resided at death in NYC zip codes less impacted by WTC dust and fumes. We found WTCHR decedents to have significantly higher iron (Fe) lung tissue concentrations than community controls. Secondary analyses among WTCHR decedents adjusted for sex and age showed the log(molybdenum (Mo)) concentration to be significantly associated with non-rescue/recovery exposure. Post hoc analyses suggested that individuals whose death certificates listed usual occupation or industry as the Sanitation or Police Departments had elevated lung tissue Fe concentrations. Among WTCHR decedents, exposure to the WTC dust cloud was significantly associated with elevated lung tissue concentrations of titanium (Ti), chromium (Cr) and cadmium (Cd) in non-parametric univariable analyses but not in multivariable analyses adjusted for age and smoking status. Logistic regression adjusted for age and smoking status among WTCHR decedents showed one or more respiratory symptoms to be positively associated with log (arsenic (As)), log(manganese (Mn)) and log(cobalt (Co)) concentrations, while new-onset wheezing and sinus problems were negatively associated with log(Fe) concentration. Fe concentrations among individuals with wheezing, nonetheless, exceeded those in community controls. In conclusion, these data suggest that further research may be warranted to explore the utility as biomarkers of WTC exposure of Fe in particular and, to a lesser extent, Mo, Ti, Cr and Cd in digestions of lung tissue.


Assuntos
Sons Respiratórios , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro , Humanos , Cádmio , Poeira , Sistema de Registros , Pulmão , Biomarcadores , Cadáver , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia
9.
J Dual Diagn ; 19(4): 180-188, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37796633

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study the New York City area population after the September 11, 2001, 9/11 attacks, focusing on tobacco and drug use and drug use disorders. An abundance of research has identified the important mental health sequelae stemming from exposure to disasters, especially vulnerability to the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD). There also is a body of literature on the association of disaster exposure with alcohol use/misuse, but far less research on tobacco and other drug use/disorders. METHODS: A terrorism-affected sample (N = 379) was assessed nearly 3 years after the attacks using structured diagnostic interviews, providing predisaster and postdisaster prevalence and incidence of tobacco and drug use, changes in tobacco and drug use, and predisaster and postdisaster prevalence and incidence of drug use disorders in relation to the 9/11 attacks. DSM-IV criteria were fully assessed using structured diagnostic interviews for psychiatric disorders including PTSD, MDD, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and alcohol and drug use disorders. RESULTS: Tobacco use did not increase significantly, and no predictors of increased tobacco use could be found for any subgroups, including disaster trauma exposures. Drug use (largely cannabis) increased initially but decreased by 3 years after the attacks. Drug use disorders, which were associated with other psychiatric disorders, were rare and primarily began prior to 9/11. CONCLUSIONS: The overall lack of increase of tobacco use or predictors of increased use found after the disaster and the low rates of new drug use disorders suggest that universal screening for increased tobacco use and new drug use disorders by clinicians may have very low yield. Regardless, postdisaster settings provide suitable circumstances for general discussions about self-care including concern for increased tobacco use, avoiding drug use, and guidance on healthier means of managing stress than through substances. Additionally, because existing tobacco and drug use are endemic in populations, the postdisaster setting can serve as a reminder for clinicians to assess these problems generally and provide appropriate referrals when needed. Postdisaster circumstances offer opportunities to disseminate and promote public health messages and address issues of substance use and misuse.


Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Drogas Ilícitas , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/complicações
10.
Am J Ind Med ; 66(12): 1048-1055, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37746817

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: It is unclear whether differences in health outcomes by racial and ethnic groups among World Trade Center (WTC) rescue and recovery workers reflect those of the population of New York State (NYS) or show distinct patterns. We assessed cancer incidence in WTC workers by self-reported race and ethnicity, and compared it to population figures for NYS. METHODS: A total of 61,031 WTC workers enrolled between September 11, 2001 and January 10, 2012 were followed to December 31, 2015. To evaluate the association between race/ethnicity and cancer risk, Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) adjusted for WTC exposure, age, calendar year, sex and, for lung cancer, cigarette smoking. RESULTS: In comparison to Whites, Black workers had a higher incidence of prostate cancer (HR = 1.99, 95% CI = 1.69-2.34) and multiple myeloma (HR = 3.57, 95% CI = 1.97-6.45), and a lower incidence of thyroid (HR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.22-0.78) and colorectal cancer (HR = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.33-0.98). Hispanic workers had a higher incidence of liver cancer (HR = 4.03, 95% CI = 2.23-7.28). Compared with NYS population, White workers had significantly higher incidence of prostate cancer (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.18-1.35) and thyroid cancer (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.55-2.08), while Black workers had significantly higher incidence of prostate cancer (HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.05-1.40). CONCLUSION: Cancer incidence in WTC workers generally reflects data from the NYS population, but some differences were identified that merit further investigation.


Assuntos
Exposição Ocupacional , Neoplasias da Próstata , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro , Neoplasias da Glândula Tireoide , Masculino , Humanos , Incidência , Etnicidade , Trabalho de Resgate , Estudos de Coortes , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos
11.
J Community Health ; 48(6): 937-944, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37420014

RESUMO

This study aimed to identify the prevalence of substance use before and during COVID-19; and examined its association with depression and social factors among 437 residents from the neighborhood of Harlem in Northern Manhattan, New York City. Over a third of respondents reported using any substance before COVID-19, and initiating/increasing substance use during COVID-19. The most common substances used before COVID-19 and initiated/increased during COVID-19 were smoking (20.8% vs. 18.3%), marijuana (18.8% vs. 15.3%), and vaping (14.2% and 11.4%). The percentages of any hard drug use were 7.3% and 3.4%, respectively. After adjustment, residents with mild (Prevalence Ratio [PR] = 2.86, 95% CI 1.65, 4.92) and moderate (PR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.86, 5.56) symptoms of depression, and housing insecurity (PR = 1.47, 95% CI 1.12, 1.91) had at least a 47% greater probability of initiating and/or increasing substance use. Conversely, respondents with employment insecurity (PR = 0.71, 95% CI 0.57, 0.88) were 29% less likely to report such patterns. No association was found between substance use initiation and/or increase and food insecurity. High prevalence of substance use during COVID-19 may lead residents to turn to substance use as a coping mechanism for psychosocial stressors. Thus, it is essential to provide accessible and culturally sensitive mental health and substance use services.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Fatores Sociais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
12.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis ; 26(3): 628-630, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37391594

RESUMO

Social determinants of health may impact prostate cancer presentation. Since neighborhoods may influence adjacent neighborhoods across often porous and arbitrary borders, we performed generalized spatial two stage least squares cross sections regression to assess direct and indirect (via adjacent neighborhoods) impact of neighborhood level independent variables. Using the New York State Public Access Cancer Epidemiology Data and the NYC Open neighborhood-level dataset, we discovered a direct association between Race and poverty with the likelihood of presenting with advanced prostate cancer. There were no indirect impacts of neighborhood variables, indicating the need to directly target neighborhoods to improve outcomes.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Masculino , Humanos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Pobreza , Fatores Sociais
13.
J Community Health ; 48(6): 1015-1025, 2023 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37322364

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Mental disorders and substance use disorders are highly comorbid. The "self-medication hypothesis" posits that individuals may use substances such as tobacco and alcohol to cope with symptoms associated with untreated mental health problems. The present study examined the association between having a currently untreated mental health condition and tobacco and alcohol use among male taxi drivers in NYC, a population at risk for poor mental and physical health outcomes. METHODS: The sample included 1105 male, ethnoracially diverse, primarily foreign-born NYC taxi drivers participating in a health fair program. This secondary cross-sectional analysis utilized logistic regression modeling to examine whether endorsement of a currently untreated mental health problem (i.e., depression, anxiety, or posttraumatic stress disorder) was associated with alcohol and/or tobacco use, controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: 8.5% of drivers reported having mental health problems; among these, only 0.5% reported receiving treatment. Untreated mental health problems were associated with an increased risk of current tobacco/alcohol use after controlling for age, educational attainment, nativity, and pain history: drivers with untreated mental health problems had 1.9x the odds of reporting current tobacco use [95% CI: 1.10-3.19] and 1.6x the odds of reporting current alcohol use [95% CI: 1.01-2.46] than those without untreated mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: Few drivers with mental health problems receive treatment. In line with the self-medication hypothesis, drivers with untreated mental health problems demonstrated significantly increased risk of tobacco and alcohol use. Efforts to encourage timely screening and treatment of mental health problems among taxi drivers are warranted.


Assuntos
Saúde Mental , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Uso de Tabaco/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
14.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 9: e2200303, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37348022

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Studies have shown that patients with cancer are more likely to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) than noncancer patients for symptom relief and hope. We aimed to evaluate factors of race, ethnic groups, and immigration status in attitude of patients with cancer in seeking out CAM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a prospective questionnaire study where information on demographics, cancer information, race/ethnicity, immigration duration, and psychosocial factors was correlated with the CAM use in a community cancer center located in the borough of Brooklyn, at New York City. RESULTS: Among 658 patients, the prevalence of CAM use was 66.11%. CAM use was 71.98% in females and 54.34% in males (P = .113 × 10-4). Patients of African descent had higher CAM use (72.73%) than the White patients (63.53%; P = .0371). There was no difference of CAM use between the US born (68.77%) and the immigrants (63.98%, P = .199) as a whole; however, comparing with the US born (66.50%), Asian-born immigrants had lower CAM use (53.77%, P = .0161), whereas Latin-American born had a numerical trend toward higher CAM use (74.83%, P = .0608). The number of years of living in the United States was not associated with more CAM use. Prayer and spirituality was the most common CAM subtype used (25.91%). There was no difference in CAM use in the respective non-White ethnic groups whether they were US born or non-US born. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients with cancer enriched with immigration background, CAM use was the highest in African American patients. The use of CAM in the non-White patients was associated with their ethnic background, regardless whether they were US born or not. Cultural roots appeared to be a strong influencing factor for the usage of CAM.


Assuntos
Terapias Complementares , Emigração e Imigração , Neoplasias , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Terapias Complementares/psicologia , Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Emigração e Imigração/estatística & dados numéricos , Etnicidade , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/etnologia , Neoplasias/psicologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , População Negra/etnologia , População Negra/psicologia , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , População Africana/psicologia , População Africana/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos/psicologia , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Asiático/psicologia , Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Esperança
15.
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) ; 81(2): 131-135, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37200331

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic resulted in new, non-orthopedic roles for many members of our New York City based orthopedic department, including redeployment to medicine wards, emergency departments, and intensive care units. The purpose of this study was to determine if certain areas of redeployment predisposed individuals to higher likelihood of positive diagnostic or serologic testing for COVID-19. METHODS: In this study, attendings, residents, and phy-sician assistants within our orthopedic department were surveyed to determine their roles during the COVID-19 pandemic and whether they were tested via diagnostic or serologic methods for detecting COVID-19. Additionally, symptoms and missed days of work were reported. RESULTS: No significant association between redeployment site and rate of positive COVID-19 diagnostic (p = 0.91) or serologic (p = 0.38) testing was detected. Sixty individuals responded to the survey, with 88.3% of respondents rede-ployed during the pandemic. Nearly half (n = 28) of those redeployed experienced at least one COVID-19 related symptom. Two respondents had a positive diagnostic test, and 10 had a positive serologic test. CONCLUSIONS: Area of redeployment during the COVID-19 pandemic is not associated with an increased risk of subse-quently having a positive diagnostic or serologic COVID-19 test.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Teste para COVID-19 , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Atenção Terciária à Saúde , Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos
16.
J Urban Health ; 100(3): 638-648, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37249819

RESUMO

This study examined alcohol misuse and binge drinking prevalence among Harlem residents, in New York City, and their associations with psycho-social factors such as substance use, depression symptom severity, and perception of community policing during COVID-19. An online cross-sectional study was conducted among 398 adult residents between April and September 2021. Participants with a score of at least 3 for females or at least 4 for males out of 12 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test were considered to have alcohol misuse. Binge drinking was defined as self-reporting having six or more drinks on one occasion. Modified Poisson regression models were used to examine associations. Results showed that 42.7% used alcohol before COVID-19, 69.1% used it during COVID-19, with 39% initiating or increasing alcohol use during COVID-19. Alcohol misuse and binge drinking prevalence during COVID-19 were 52.3% and 57.0%, respectively. Higher severity of depression symptomatology, history of drug use and smoking cigarettes, and experiencing housing insecurity were positively associated with both alcohol misuse and binge drinking. Lower satisfaction with community policing was only associated with alcohol misuse, while no significant associations were found between employment insecurity and food insecurity with alcohol misuse or binge drinking. The findings suggest that Harlem residents may have resorted to alcohol use as a coping mechanism to deal with the impacts of depression and social stressors during COVID-19. To mitigate alcohol misuse, improving access to mental health and substance use disorder services, and addressing public safety through improving relations with police could be beneficial.


Assuntos
Alcoolismo , Consumo Excessivo de Bebidas Alcoólicas , COVID-19 , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Alcoolismo/epidemiologia , Consumo Excessivo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Consumo Excessivo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/epidemiologia , Etanol , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia
17.
Clin Imaging ; 100: 1-6, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37120922

RESUMO

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The COVID-19 pandemic led to the national shutdown and subsequent reopening of cancer screening programs. Our diverse inner-city lung cancer screening program serves patients in the Bronx NY, which was severely affected by COVID-19, with the highest mortality in New York State in the spring of 2020. Staffing redeployment, quarantine protocols, increased safety measures, and changes in follow up resulted. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of the pandemic on lung cancer screening volumes during the first year of the pandemic. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Retrospective cohort comprised of all patients enrolled in our Bronx, NY lung cancer screening program from March 2019 to March 2021 who underwent LDCT or appropriate follow-up imaging. The pre-pandemic and pandemic period were defined as 3/28/2019 to 3/21/2020 and 3/22/2020 to 3/17/2021, respectively, dichotomized by the New York State lockdown. RESULTS: 1218 exams were performed in the pre-pandemic period and 857 in the pandemic period, a 29.6% decrease. The percentage of exams performed on newly enrolled patients decreased from 32.7% to 13.8% (p < 0.001). Patients in the pre-pandemic period and pandemic period respectively had the following demographic breakdown: mean age 66.9 ± 5.9 vs 66.5 ± 6.0, women 51.9% vs 51.6%, White 20.7% vs 20.3%, Hispanic/Latino 42.0% vs 36.3%. There was no significant difference in Lung-RADS scores for pre-pandemic and pandemic exams (p > 0.05). In the pandemic period, exam volume followed an inverted parabolic pattern, reflecting Covid surges for the cohort and all demographic subgroups. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly decreased lung cancer screening volume and new enrollment in our urban inner-city program. Screening volumes demonstrated a parabolic curve reflecting pandemic surges following the initial wave, unlike other reports. The combination of the impact of COVID on our population and lack of staffing redundancy in the screening program, in the face of typical COVID isolation and quarantine absences, impeded early pandemic rebound of our lung cancer screening program. This highlights the necessity of fostering resilience by developing robust programmatic resources.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Controle de Doenças Transmissíveis
18.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283730, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36996149

RESUMO

Patients with heart failure (HF) often have multiple chronic conditions and are at increased risk for severe disease and mortality when infected by SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Furthermore, disparities in outcomes with COVID-19 have been associated with both racial/ethnic identity but also social determinants of health. Among older, urban-dwelling, minority patients with HF, we sought to characterize medical and non-medical factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients with HF living in Boston and New York City over 60 years of age participating in the Screening for Cardiac Amyloidosis with Nuclear Imaging (SCAN-MP) study between 12/1/2019 and 10/15/2021 (n = 180) were tested for nucleocapsid antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and queried for symptomatic infection with PCR verification. Baseline testing included the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), assessment of health literacy, biochemical, functional capacity, echocardiography, and a novel survey tool that determined living conditions, perceived risk of infection, and attitudes towards COVID-19 mitigation. The association of infection with prevalent socio-economic conditions was assessed by the area deprivation index (ADI). There were 50 overall cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection (28%) including 40 demonstrating antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (indicative of prior infection) and 10 positive PCR tests. There was no overlap between these groups. The first documented case from New York City indicated infection prior to January 17, 2020. Among active smokers, none tested positive for prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (0 (0%) vs. 20 (15%), p = 0.004) vs. non-smokers. Cases were more likely to be taking ACE-inhibitors/ARBs compared to non-cases (78% vs 62%, p = 0.04). Over a mean follow-up of 9.6 months, there were 6 total deaths (3.3%) all unrelated to COVID-19. Death and hospitalizations (n = 84) were not associated with incident (PCR tested) or prior (antibody) SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was no difference in age, co-morbidities, living conditions, attitudes toward mitigation, health literacy, or ADI between those with and without infection. SARS-CoV-2 infection was common among older, minority patients with HF living in New York City and Boston, with evidence of infection documented in early January 2020. Health literacy and ADI were not associated with infection, and there was no increased mortality or hospitalizations among those infected with SARS-CoV-2.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Anticorpos , COVID-19/etnologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Boston/epidemiologia , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia
19.
Ann Am Thorac Soc ; 20(8): 1136-1143, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36961515

RESUMO

Rationale: In numerous cohorts, lung function decline is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular-cause mortality, but the association between the decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and cancer-cause mortality, particularly after occupational/environmental exposure(s), is unclear. Exposure to dust/smoke from the World Trade Center (WTC) disaster caused inflammation and lung injury in Fire Department of the City of New York rescue/recovery workers. In addition, prior research found that >10% of the cohort experienced greater than twice the age-related decrease in FEV1 (⩾64 ml/yr). Objectives: To evaluate the association of longitudinal lung function with all-cause and cancer-cause mortality after exposure to the WTC disaster. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study using longitudinal prebronchodilator FEV1 data for 12,264 WTC-exposed firefighters and emergency medical service providers. All-cause and cancer-cause mortality were ascertained using National Death Index data from September 12, 2001, through December 31, 2021. Joint longitudinal survival models evaluated the association of baseline FEV1 and change in FEV1 from baseline with all-cause and cancer-cause mortality adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, height, smoking, work assignment (firefighters vs. emergency medical service providers), and WTC exposure. Results: By December 31, 2021, 607 of the 12,264 individuals in the cohort (4.9%) had died (crude rate = 259.5 per 100,000 person-years), and 190 of 12,264 (1.5%) had died from cancer (crude rate = 81.2 per 100,000 person-years). Baseline FEV1 was ⩾80% predicted in 10,970 of the 12,264 (89.4%); final FEV1 was ⩾80% in 9,996 (81.5%). Lower FEV1 at baseline was associated with greater risk for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR] per liter = 2.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.98-2.72) and cancer-cause mortality (HR per liter = 1.99; 95% CI = 1.49-2.66). Longitudinally, each 100-ml/yr decrease in FEV1 was associated with an 11% increase in all-cause mortality (HR = 1.11; 95% CI = 1.06-1.15) and a 7% increase in cancer-cause mortality (HR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.00-1.15). Compared with FEV1 decrease <64 ml/yr, those with FEV1 decrease ⩾64 ml/yr had higher all-cause (HR = 2.91; 95% CI = 2.37-3.56) and cancer-cause mortality (HR = 2.68; 95% CI = 1.90-3.79). Conclusions: Baseline FEV1 and longitudinal FEV1 decrease are associated with increased risk of all-cause and cancer-cause mortality in a previously healthy occupational cohort, the majority of whom had normal lung function, after intense exposure to dust/smoke. Further investigation is needed to define pathways by which lung function impacts mortality after an irritant exposure.


Assuntos
Pneumopatias , Neoplasias , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Pulmão , Poeira , Fumaça , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia
20.
Occup Environ Med ; 80(6): 297-303, 2023 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36972975

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality rates in World Trade Center (WTC)-exposed Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) firefighters with rates in similarly healthy, non-WTC-exposed/non-FDNY firefighters, and compare mortality in each firefighter cohort with the general population. METHODS: 10 786 male WTC-exposed FDNY firefighters and 8813 male non-WTC-exposed firefighters from other urban fire departments who were employed on 11 September 2001 were included in the analyses. Only WTC-exposed firefighters received health monitoring via the WTC Health Programme (WTCHP). Follow-up began 11 September 2001 and ended at the earlier of death date or 31 December 2016. Death data were obtained from the National Death Index and demographics from the fire departments. We estimated standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) in each firefighter cohort versus US males using demographic-specific US mortality rates. Poisson regression models estimated relative rates (RRs) of all-cause and cause-specific mortality in WTC-exposed versus non-WTC-exposed firefighters, controlling for age and race. RESULTS: Between 11 September 2001 and 31 December 2016, there were 261 deaths among WTC-exposed firefighters and 605 among non-WTC-exposed. Both cohorts had reduced all-cause mortality compared with US males (SMR (95% CI)=0.30 (0.26 to 0.34) and 0.60 (0.55 to 0.65) in WTC-exposed and non-WTC-exposed, respectively). WTC-exposed firefighters also had lower rates of all-cause mortality (RR=0.54, 95% CI=0.49 to 0.59) and cancer-specific, cardiovascular-specific and respiratory disease-specific mortality compared with non-WTC-exposed firefighters. CONCLUSION: Both firefighter cohorts had lower than expected all-cause mortality. Fifteen years post 11 September 2001, mortality was lower in WTC-exposed versus non-WTC-exposed firefighters. Lower mortality in the WTC-exposed suggests not just a healthy worker effect, but additional factors such as greater access to free health monitoring and treatment that they receive via the WTCHP.


Assuntos
Bombeiros , Neoplasias , Exposição Ocupacional , Ataques Terroristas de 11 de Setembro , Humanos , Masculino , Trabalho de Resgate , Causas de Morte , New York/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA